Opinion about William Bennet's 1998 Quote on Education Essay

Opinion about William Bennet's 1998 Quote on Education - Essay Example This phenomenon is still, however; conceptually unclear to many people and few understand how it impacts the schools on which the legalization operates (Neal & Kirp, 1985; 2000). There are various aspects of the modern schooling which have been concealed. These include the deterioration such a legalization system imposes in the morality of students and teachers versus that of the parents. The parents have no say when it comes to choosing their children’s teachers. There is not much information given on teachers because of the protection of such information by law. Interestingly, the State knows so little about it. In this confusion, the teachers who are disposed have no idea of each other’s information (State University, 2011). Duplication of knowledge has been proposed as the best way to go for developing countries. Yet, we have restrictions on copyright materials. It is common knowledge that not every student will invent new ideas. Setting up legal restrictions on who can use the education materials and how, poses a great challenge for those who might not afford the cost. As can be seen, the Copyright Act gives a number of exceptional situations to the above law. Protecting the author’s work is good, but this has an effect on limiting the number of people who can access them. This brings about discrimination since not all students will have the money to afford purchase of such materials (Neal & Kirp, 1985; 2000). The legalization of education system in the 1950s brought about the entry of minorities into the public schools that practiced segregation. However; this exposed them to greater problems of chaos and constant violence, which in most cases went unpunished leading to the white flight to private institutions of learning (State University, 2011). Legalizations of education institutions are mostly aimed at making the schools a conducive place for all to acquire education. However; given the restrictions imposed on the teachers and the administration, the schools lose focus on their main missions and objectives. The legalization leads to the known de-emphasis on the teaching process and learning, which are meant to be the basic tenets of institutional establishments in the first place. With the growth of the state into a more litigious status, the schools have become even more bureaucratic in the process. It is truly appalling since learning institutions are supposed to be flexible and nurtures of change, efficiency and effectiveness. Yet many agree that schools, especially institutions of higher learning are the most bureaucratic establishments in the current society. It is like copying the government system and perfecting the art of bureaucracy (State University, 2011). Given the legalization processes, the school administrators turn institutions into fiefdoms as places of exercising their unchecked authority. Principals have had to meet out serious and unfair punishments to teachers who are in record for havin g questioned their status quo. The restrictions given to education institutions could still be looked at as one way of the government’s evasion of responsibility for what goes on in these schools. Instead of being fully involved in the process, the state takes an oversight role and leaves the backlog of problems to the school authorities who end up misusing such powers. Laws alone without a thorough implementation and